![]() ![]() ![]() That excuse was made partly (only partly) because SafeDisc is old and wasn't updated in quite a while.Ĭorrect it'd put the responsibility of maintaining it on Microsoft, which is hardly easy. Kill it before it's exploited, not after. It's silly to argue and suggest that "Well no one uses it." is a legitimate reason to ignore it. It's incredibly unlikely hackers will use any potential insecurities of SafeDisc - they'll go through other exploits in the operating systems. They'd do the same if Denuvo lost support and had an exploitable driver. The bottom line is that these protocols were very evidently points of attack, and since their original companies were no longer maintaining them, Microsoft decided to cut support altogether. Coincidentally this driver exploit seems to have effected SecuROM as well. The SafeDisc protocol is abandoned developmentally, and the driver (At least the one that Microsoft didn't fix themselves) had an elevation exploit in it that was not fixed by it's devs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |